WHAT’S ADVANCING
Forty abstracts into one review matrix
A week of extraction work in one pass, with "not stated" marked honestly instead of filled in.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1Applied AI for doctors, one clinical task at a time.
GREYBRAIN FIELDNOTES
One stream shows you something you can make this week. The other looks at what is being claimed, and what the evidence actually supports. Both end at a skill you can practise.
THE EDITORIAL LIBRARY · RECENT FIELDNOTES
WHAT’S ADVANCING
A week of extraction work in one pass, with "not stated" marked honestly instead of filled in.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S ADVANCING
A palette with hex codes, a font pairing, a mark, a post template and the rules to stay consistent.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F4WHAT’S ADVANCING
Ten questions with the confident wrong answer named for each — the part that takes years of examining to learn.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S ADVANCING
A defensible elective — objectives, assessment and rubric — in the shape a curriculum committee expects to receive it.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3WHAT’S ADVANCING
Five questions that make it yours, then a draft in your own register with the unsaid thing named.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F6WHAT’S ADVANCING
Where demand actually is, what cancellations have in common, and three changes with a way to measure each.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F0WHAT’S ADVANCING
A usable session visual, plus the instructions to adjust it and keep a series consistent.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S ADVANCING
The same explanation in four registers, plus a list of what each one quietly dropped.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S ADVANCING
The argument against your analysis, written before a reviewer or a statistician makes it for you.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S ADVANCING
A complete personal site in one file, with every blank marked and three free ways to publish it.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F4WHAT’S ADVANCING
A teaching diagram plus a blank version to hand out — and an honest list of what the picture oversimplifies.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S ADVANCING
An audit report that opens with the honest state of your data instead of hiding it — including what you must start recording.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3WHAT’S ADVANCING
Twelve weeks designed around call nights, with a rule for the week you miss and a finishable thing at the end.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F6WHAT’S ADVANCING
A run sheet, a materials list, an offline-proof exercise and the five things that will go wrong.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F0WHAT’S ADVANCING
The question session rehearsed before it happens, including the one you were hoping nobody would ask.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S ADVANCING
The timeline, the contradictions and the gaps — the three things that take an hour to find by hand.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S ADVANCING
A week of extraction work in one pass, with "not stated" marked honestly instead of filled in.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1THE EVERGREEN PRACTICE LIBRARY
Eight exercises that are always here, whichever hat you are wearing today.
EVERGREEN PRACTICE · THE ACADEMICIAN
There’s reading a paper. And then there’s really getting under its skin. Bring your curiosity. Learn a more deliberate way to explore.
A paper for tomorrow’s journal club. A dozen questions worth asking.
A fictional journal-club abstract describes 48 residents whose mean quiz score rose from 6/10 to 8/10 immediately after a workshop. There is no control group, follow-up or patient-outcome measure.
Make a claim/evidence/limitation table. Identify why this cannot establish a lasting improvement in clinical care. Draft three questions for journal club.
Your check: Separate supplied facts from suggestions. Open the source, identify what is missing and record what you changed.
An AI draft can overclaim confidently, in fluent English, with no warning that it has done so. This is the check that keeps the doctor in the loop.
48 residents attended a journal-club workshop. Their average appraisal quiz score rose from 6/10 before the workshop to 8/10 immediately afterwards.
No comparison group. No later follow-up. Patient outcomes were not measured.
Now imagine handing this to an AI and asking for a summary for tomorrow’s journal club. Your job is what comes next: checking what it hands back.
This example is prewritten. No live AI request or real study is involved.
Self-paced foundations. Private capstone work. An exam and assessed progression towards the IIHMR Bangalore certificate programme. Eligibility and programme terms apply.
Explore the learning and certificate pathway ↗